Students Want Elections but Run Separately From Opposition
After Vidovdan, students repeat that their goal is to change the system through an electoral win, but a deal with the opposition is missing, so several separate lists are expected.

- At a rally in Kraljevo, students repeated that their goal is to change the system, with elections and an electoral win as a necessary step.
- Citizens could sign up as election observers, while aid was collected for children from Kosovo and Metohija.
- A deal between the student list and the opposition on a joint run is missing, so analysts see several separate lists as the realistic outcome.
- Autumn, the window between October and November, is floated as the more likely date.
At a rally in Kraljevo, students repeated the message they set out with more than a year ago. The aim is not a single concession or a single resignation, but a change of the system, with elections and an electoral win as a necessary step toward it. After Vidovdan that message takes on a practical shape, because the question now is how exactly the vote is approached and with whom.
The Kraljevo rally also had a fair-style section that best shows where the movement stands. Citizens could sign up there as election observers, building a network meant to monitor the process at the polling station itself. Aid for children from Kosovo and Metohija was collected at the same time. This is the move from a protest phase to an organizing phase, which is the decisive step for any electoral list.
Will the students and the opposition run together or apart?
Here lies a crack that no single rally closes. A deal between the student list and the opposition on a joint run is still missing. The students insist on their own identity and on distance from parties that have been part of institutional politics for years, while parts of the opposition argue that only a unified list guarantees a serious result.
Analysts therefore name several separate lists, rather than a single bloc, as the realistic scenario. That arrangement cuts both ways. More lists mean a broader offer and a chance to mobilize different groups of voters that one list would not attract. At the same time, splitting the vote carries risk at the threshold and in the distribution of seats, especially if part of the vote scatters onto lists that fail to clear the census. The question of coordination, at least over observers and ballot protection, stays open regardless of how many lists there end up being.
The authorities read this division as proof that no unified alternative exists. From the ruling majority comes the line that this is a movement without a clear program and without the capacity to agree within its own ranks, the standard argument of any group defending power before an election cycle.
Vucic stalls on a date, with autumn the likely window
The second unknown rests with the president. Aleksandar Vucic earlier announced his resignation as president and a possible move to prime minister, with the variant that Ana Brnabic takes over presidential powers. Such a swap shifts the center of gravity of power, but it does not change the calculus around the date.
Analysts assess that Vucic is stalling on calling the election, with autumn, the window between October and November, floated as the more likely term. The logic of delay is simple. The longer the gap until the vote, the more time there is for regrouping on all sides, including for the division already visible among his opponents to widen. On the other hand, a long wait also wears down the government itself, since it prolongs the uncertainty voters feel every day.
The electoral equation thus comes down to two unknowns that cross each other. On one side is the number of lists that will emerge from the student and opposition camp, on the other the date still held by the top of the government. Whichever of those two questions is answered first will likely set the tone of the whole campaign. So, do you think more separate lists help change or split it?



