Terza Announces Paternity Suit, Brother's Messages Leak

Borislav Terzic Terza has announced that the dispute over his daughter will no longer be settled through televised confrontations but in court, and only a day later messages from his brother Milos surfaced, showing how deep the conflict with Milica Velickovic actually runs.

Terza wants to be officially registered as the child’s father and to be allowed to see her. “I demand to be registered as the father and that she allows me to see the child,” he said, adding that he is already preparing a room for the girl at home. A paternity claim as a rule involves DNA testing, which is why that word has dominated the comments under every post the two of them make.

What exactly did Terza say

“Because of all this I want everything to go through the courts, and I do not want to be stopped from seeing my child,” Terza said. In another statement he sounded more conciliatory: “I am sorry I have to go to court, but clearly the girl does not want any kind of agreement.”

That is the crucial shift from everything he has said so far. Their entire dispute has played out in a television studio and on social media, in public exchanges that were entertainment for viewers and daily life for them. Now, for the first time, he is naming an institution rather than a show.

He also admitted he is uncomfortable that the argument is being conducted on camera. “I am genuinely embarrassed that I have to trade insults in public,” he said, adding that the child should not suffer because of a relationship between two adults.

Why did his brother’s messages change the tone of the story?

The messages from Milos Terzic were published shortly after the announcement and, judging by the reaction, they landed harder than the announcement itself.

In them, Milos claims Milica is using the child as leverage against the Terzic family. “The child serves her as a way to spite us, and that is exactly what I will not allow,” reads one of the messages. The tone is blunt and far sharper than anything Terza said in his own statements.

Milos also made clear that a longer stay for the child with them is not something to be agreed in passing, because everyone in the house would have to change their routine and their commitments. According to those messages, the family’s demand is straightforward: fixed dates, rules and proper organisation instead of improvising case by case.

That is precisely where you can see why Terza turned to the courts at all. What began as a dispute between two former reality show partners has grown into a family matter involving other people as well, and situations like that are rarely settled by an agreement reached on air.

If proceedings are actually filed, the first question before a judge will not be who is right in the messages, but who is the father on paper. Everything else, visits, stays and schedules, comes only after that, and under rules set by a court rather than by a reality show audience.

Do you think court is the only way out when two former partners cannot agree about a child, or has the public feuding already caused damage that no ruling can repair?