Srpske NovineSrpske Novine

Slovakia: 77 headless skeletons found in 7,000-year-old ditch

A University of Kiel team near Vrable unearthed an almost kilometre-long ditch holding 77 headless skeletons. A study in the Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society reads the skull removal as a post-mortem ritual.

Aleksandar Tomić3 min read0
Podeli
Aerial view of an archaeological site with linear excavation trenches in an open field
Archaeological site with an excavated ditch (illustrative photo)/ Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
In brief
  • Near the village of Vrable in south-western Slovakia, researchers dug out an almost 1,000-metre ditch holding 77 headless skeletons.
  • Excavations have run since 2022 under a University of Kiel team; the settlement belongs to the Linear Pottery culture.
  • Cut marks suggest the heads were removed after death as a ritual, not in an act of violence, since the bodies show no signs of killing.
  • The findings were published in 2026 in the Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

A team of archaeologists from the University of Kiel has unearthed an almost kilometre-long ditch near the village of Vrable in south-western Slovakia, containing 77 headless human skeletons roughly 7,000 years old. The find belongs to a Neolithic settlement of the Linear Pottery culture, one of the earliest farming communities in central Europe. The results were published in 2026 in the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

The settlement at Vrable has been investigated systematically since 2022. On the evidence so far, it is one of the largest Neolithic sites in the region, with several clustered compounds and a defensive ditch enclosing them. It was inside that ditch, long read mainly as a protective structure, that researchers found a large concentration of human remains lacking skulls. The number and arrangement of the skeletons set this find apart from the single graves usual for the period.

What most interested the team was how the heads were removed, and when. Analysis of the bones shows fine cut marks on the neck vertebrae, consistent across many of the skeletons. According to the team’s interpretation, those marks point to careful separation of the head after death, rather than the violent beheading of living people. The bodies carry no fractures, slashes or other injuries that would suggest execution or combat.

Why do researchers think this was a ritual rather than violence?

The argument rests on several independent lines of evidence. First, the position of the bodies in the ditch looks orderly, not like the hurried disposal of victims after a clash. Second, burial appears, on a preliminary assessment, to have followed soon after death, which suggests the community did not discard the bodies as refuse but handled them within a funerary practice. Third, the absence of perimortem injuries, meaning injuries inflicted at the moment of death, does not fit a massacre scenario.

Skull removal is not unknown in the Neolithic. At several sites across central Europe and the Near East, researchers have recorded special treatment of the dead’s heads, from separation to curation. The new study adds Vrable to that picture and proposes that this was a standardised, repeatable practice within a single community rather than an isolated event. The authors stress that this does not mean the motive is fully explained, only that the available traces fit a ritual reading better than a violent one.

What this find does not prove

It is worth being precise about the limits of the conclusion. The study does not claim to know the beliefs of the people who lived near Vrable 7,000 years ago, nor does it explain why heads in particular were singled out. The cut marks show how something was done, but not what it meant to those who did it. The figure of 77 skeletons also refers to the portion of the ditch excavated so far, so the final picture may shift as the dig continues.

The post-mortem ritual interpretation is, in the researchers’ own words, the most convincing reading of the data currently available, not a closed question. Future analyses, including dating of individual remains and study of the buried people’s origins, may confirm or refine this picture. How carefully do you think we should read finds like this before crediting a Neolithic community with a specific belief?

Podeli
Komentari…
Next storyStudy Maps Stonehenge Altar Stone Journey from ScotlandA new geological analysis reconstructs how the six-tonne Altar Stone was moved some 700 kilometres from north-east Scotland, ruling out glacial transport and supporting a deliberate human effort.

From other sections

Most read today

  1. Retatrutide and knee osteoarthritis: two phase 3 trials
  2. German Gas Storage Below 60%, TTF at 87.245 Euros
  3. Dzevad Prekazi, Partizan and Galatasaray legend, dies
  4. Vucevic, Brnabic React to Student List Snub of Serbian List
  5. Indjija Mayor Marko Gasic Arrested in Road Signage Case

Komentari (0)

Ostavi komentar

Komentari prolaze kratku moderaciju. Lični napadi i govor mržnje se brišu.

Još nema komentara. Budi prvi i podeli mišljenje.