Oil near $77, set for a weekly drop of about 8 percent
Crude oil eased back to around $77 a barrel after Middle East tensions cooled, heading for a weekly loss of about 8 percent, as CENTCOM lifts traffic restrictions toward Iranian ports.

- Crude oil trades near $77 a barrel, on course for a weekly loss of about 8 percent.
- The pullback follows a Middle East truce and a framework for easing tensions between the United States and Iran.
- The U.S. CENTCOM has lifted restrictions on traffic toward Iranian ports and coastal waters.
- Tehran has announced mandatory insurance for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.
Crude oil is trading near $77 a barrel, which on a weekly basis amounts to a decline of about 8 percent, the first sharp drop after several weeks in which fear of escalation in the Middle East pushed quotes above $80. Brent held near $80, while U.S. WTI slipped toward $75 by Monday. The direction is clear: the market is slowly writing off the price of risk.
The reason is geopolitical, not fundamental. After a truce between Israel and Hezbollah and a framework for easing relations between Washington and Tehran, the risk premium traders had built into every barrel began to melt away. That premium was never tied to an actual oil shortage, but to the possibility of disrupted shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint through which close to a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes. When the probability of a disruption falls, the premium disappears faster than it appeared.
What specifically unlocked the downward pressure on price?
Two moves signaled to the market that logistics were returning to normal. The U.S. CENTCOM lifted restrictions on traffic toward Iranian ports and coastal waters, giving a green light to shipping that had been on standby. In parallel, Tehran announced mandatory insurance for vessels transiting the strait, an administrative step that, however much it raises costs for shipowners, also signals that Iran is counting on continued commercial traffic rather than on closing the passage.
Some perspective is warranted. The waters off Oman remain on the list of high-risk maritime zones, so the risk has not vanished, it has merely been repriced to a lower level. Insurance premiums for routes through the Persian Gulf typically react with a lag, so part of the cost has yet to feed through to the final shipping price. For now, though, the dominant reading is that the worst-case scenario, a physical halt of flows through Hormuz, has been taken off the table.
Who feels the difference of eight percent?
A drop of about 8 percent on a weekly basis is no abstraction. For net energy importers, Serbia among them, a lower world price of crude eventually feeds into refinery procurement costs and, with a delay, into retail fuel prices. The effect is not instant: domestic pump prices also depend on the dinar’s exchange rate against the dollar, on excise duties and on margins, so a fall on the exchange does not automatically mean a cheaper tank that same week.
On the other side are the producers. For OPEC plus countries, a lower price means less revenue per barrel and pressure on fiscal projections that many of them built on the assumption that the price would stay above $80. If the downward trend continues, it raises the question of whether the cartel responds by adjusting quotas, which would be the first real test of how durable this calm is, and how much of it is merely a pause.
In the short term, the market has chosen to believe in de-escalation. The question worth watching over the coming weeks is this: is the return to $77 the start of stabilization, or just a lull before some fresh headline from the Middle East puts the risk premium back into the price of your fuel?



