Brent breaks below 83 dollars in second day of losses
October Brent futures fell 3.26% to $83.07 a barrel, the first drop below that mark in two weeks. WTI lost 3.12%, with the slide entering a second day after US strikes on Iran were halted.

- October Brent futures fell 3.26% on Tuesday to $83.07 a barrel.
- The September contract for US WTI lost 3.12% over the same session, sliding to $80.03.
- The decline is now in its second straight day, since US President Donald Trump ordered a halt to strikes on Iran.
- An Omani delegation has arrived in Tehran for talks on reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
October Brent futures fell 3.26% on Tuesday morning to $83.07 a barrel. The September contract for US WTI posted a 3.12% loss over the same session, quoted at $80.03. Brent has now slipped below the 83 dollar mark for the first time in two weeks.
This is the second consecutive daily decline. The trigger was the decision by US President Donald Trump to order a halt to strikes on Iran, after which the market shifted away from a war risk premium and towards a normalisation scenario. An Omani delegation has meanwhile arrived in Tehran, mandated to negotiate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
The drop was not uniform across contracts or exchanges. While October Brent broke through 83 dollars, some quotes held above 86 dollars on the same day, with a daily loss of less than 2%. The gap shows how thin and jumpy the market is: every headline out of the Gulf moves expectations by several dollars a barrel.
What does the Brent drop mean for prices at Serbian pumps?
There is no direct or immediate effect. At least four layers sit between the crude benchmark and the price of a litre at the pump: the dinar to dollar exchange rate, since crude is paid for in dollars, the refining margin, transport and storage costs, and finally excise duty and value added tax, which are fixed per litre or charged as a percentage and do not fall alongside the barrel.
That is why a 3% drop on the exchange does not become a 3% drop at the pump. Domestic consumers typically feel a smaller share of the move, and they feel it with a lag, because purchase prices are set off an average of quotes from the preceding period rather than a single day’s snapshot. The same logic runs in reverse, so retail prices climb more slowly than the benchmark when the barrel is rising.
For Serbia’s balance of payments, a cheaper barrel is unambiguously good news. The country imports most of its crude, so every dollar off the barrel trims the energy import bill and eases pressure on the current account deficit.
The Strait of Hormuz remains the only real variable
The Strait of Hormuz carries the bulk of seaborne crude exports from the Persian Gulf, and the market treats it as a switch: a closed passage means a risk premium in the price, an open one means a return to supply and demand fundamentals. The arrival of the Omani delegation in Tehran is the first concrete diplomatic step since the strikes were halted, and the market has already priced it in, before any agreement has been confirmed.
That is also the biggest risk attached to the current quote. The 83 dollar price is not the result of extra supply or weaker demand, but of expectations. Should the talks stall or the strikes resume, the risk premium returns to the price as quickly as it left.
The next markers traders are watching are the weekly US crude inventory figures and any statement out of Tehran or Muscat on the outcome of the talks. Until then, every year end projection is simply a bet on diplomacy.
Do you expect the fall in crude to reach the pumps in Serbia, or will it stay confined to the exchange, as it has before?



